More articles from Volume 18, Issue 2, 2026
Intersectoral Cooperation in Civil Society Sports Programs for Children Without Parental Care in Serbia
Acute Effects of Olfactory Stimulation on 50-m Sprint Swimming Performance in Competitive Swimmers
Cumulative Association of Sexual, Cognitive, and Depressive Disorders With Quality of Life After Stroke: A Rehabilitation Cohort in Kinshasa
University Belonging and Major Satisfaction among First-Year Physical Education Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Biomechanical and Technical Indicators of Talent Identification and Swimming Performance in Young Swimmers
Citations
0
Self-reported everyday cognitive failures, symptom burden and healthcare use among adult patients in southwestern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
,
Department of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education , Ijebu Ode , Nigeria
,
Department of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education , Ijebu Ode , Nigeria
Department of Biological Sciences, COSIT, Tai Solarin University of Education , Ijebu Ode , Nigeria
Editor: Danilo Radanović
Abstract
Self-reported everyday cognitive failures are common and may interfere with self-management of chronic illness, but evidence from clinical populations in sub-Saharan Africa is limited. We examined associations between cognitive failures and health symptom burden, functional limitation and healthcare utilisation among adults attending healthcare facilities in southwestern Nigeria. Multicentre cross-sectional survey across ten public hospitals in Lagos, Ogun and Oyo states, March–April 2021. The 25-item Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; theoretical range 0–100) was the primary outcome (continuous). A study-specific questionnaire captured symptoms (fatigue, shortness of breath, pain; each 0–10), daily activity limitations (4 items × 0–4, range 0–16), healthcare utilisation (counts, past 6 months) and patient-activation confidence (0–12). Primary analysis was multivariable linear regression of continuous CFQ; logistic regression for high CFQ (CFQ > sample cut-point of 32) was a sensitivity analysis. Backward elimination (p > .05 for removal) was applied to an initial model that included age, sex, ethnicity, education, marital status and health indicators; the final reduced model retained health indicators only. Complete-case sample sizes are reported. Of 1,328 eligible attendees, 1,317 consented and 1,299 had a valid CFQ score (M = 31.96 years, SD = 10.97; 62.1% female). In all, 479/1,299 (36.9%) scored above the sample cut-point of 32 (Low CFQ ≤ 32, n = 820; High CFQ > 32, n = 479). In the final linear regression (n = 1,053; R² = .132), higher health-symptom composite (B = 0.65, 95% CI [0.31, 0.99], p < .001), fatigue (B = 0.47, 95% CI [0.07, 0.87], p = .021), daily activity limitations (B = 1.21, 95% CI [0.84, 1.58], p < .001) and recent hospitalisation (B = 2.40, 95% CI [0.68, 4.12], p = .006) were associated with higher CFQ; higher patient-activation confidence was associated with lower CFQ (B = −0.58, 95% CI [−0.90, −0.27], p < .001). The logistic sensitivity analysis (n = 1,053; AUC = .708) was directionally consistent. Greater symptom burden, functional limitation and recent hospitalisation were associated with more frequent self-reported cognitive failures; higher patient-activation confidence was associated with fewer failures after adjustment. The design cannot establish direction, and the CFQ does not measure objective cognitive impairment.
Keywords
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.S.; Investigation, K.S.; Resources, K.S. and A.A.A.; Visualization, K.S.; Writing – original draft, K.S.; Writing – review & editing, K.S. and O.O.; Formal Analysis, O.O. and A.A.A.; Project administration, O.O. and A.A.A.; Supervision, O.O. and A.A.A.; Data curation, A.A.A.; Methodology, A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
Citation
Data Availability
SAS output supporting all tables and models is provided as supplementary material
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors. This research was conducted without external financial support.
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.