Issue image

More articles from Volume 9, Issue 1, 2017

Personality traits and gender effect on athletes and non-athletes selfhandicapping strategies over time

Effects of invasion games on physical fitness in primary school children

Morphological characteristics and motor abilities of boys aged 15 and 17

Gender-related differences in motor abilities of children in the fencing school

Contemporary sports product and making a brand

Citations

Crossref Logo

2

Crossref Logo

Radenko M. Matic, María Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Jelena Damnjanović, Branka Maksimovic, Nataša Papić-Blagojević, Isidora Milošević, Jovan Vuković

(2022)

Professional competencies development of sports science students: the need for more entrepreneurship education

Management & Marketing, 17(s1)

10.2478/mmcks-2022-0024

Crossref Logo

Adnan Yousef Atoum

(2020)

Self-Handicapping and its Relation to Self-Efficacy Among Yarmouk University Jordanian Students

Current Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2)

10.12944/CRJSSH.2.2.05

Personality traits and gender effect on athletes and non-athletes selfhandicapping strategies over time

Nikola Prpa
Nikola Prpa

University of Thessaly, Greece

Published: 15.06.2017.

Volume 9, Issue 1 (2017)

pp. 5-14;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.170601

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine differences in the use of self-handicapping strategies in athletes and non-athletes, changes in self-handicapping strategies that can occur with the approach of an important event, and the relationships between these strategies and personality traits, gender, and some external criteria such as performance. The sample included 183 subjects (mean age 21.16 years) consisting of 102 non-athletes and 81 athletes. Three questionnaires were used: VP+2, for measuring personality dimensions of seven-factor model, SH-17, for the assessment of changes in the use of self-handicapping strategies through time and a general biographical questionnaire. A general linear model for repeated measures was used for data analysis. Significant correlation was found between self-handicapping strategies and the number of medals and awards won at international and domestic competitions. The results also showed a positive correlation between self-handicapping strategies and dimensions of Neuroticism and Extraversion and negative with Conscientiousness. Also, a statistically significant difference in the use of self-handicapping strategies was found between athletes and non-athletes, showing that non-athletes express more self-handicapping behaviour. The results indicate that the frequency of selfhandicapping behaviour does not change through time. The effect of gender on self-handicapping is not significant, but there was a statistically significant interaction effect of gender and population on self-handicapping behaviour. It indicates that male non-athletes are more prone to self-handicapping 10 days before an important competition (exam or public speaking for general population, or “game of the season” for sporting population) compared to male athletes. These results, apart from the gender differences, are consistent with the results of previous studies. Limitations of this research and possible directions for future studies were also considered. 

Keywords

References

Arkin, R., & Baumgardner, A. (1985). Attribution: Basic issues and applications. 169–202.
Bailis, D. (2001). Benefits of self-handicapping in sport: A field study of university athletes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087143
Baumeister, R., Kahn, J., & Tice, D. (1990). Obesity as a self-handicapping strategy: Personality, selective attribution of problems, and weight loss. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121–123.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. (1978). Drug choice as a selfhandicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405
Čolović, P., Smederevac, S., & Mitrović, D. (2009). Osobine ličnosti, starost i pol kao prediktori sklonosti ka samohendikepiranju. Psihologija, 549–566.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles