EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Comparison of adolescents with different annual quota of Physical Education classes in anthropometric parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements
Vedran Džakula1 • Zvonko Miljković2 • Leo Pavičić3 • Brigita Banjac4✉
Received: 2nd July, 2020 |
DOI: 10.31382/eqol.201201 |
Accepted: 9th November, 2020 |
|
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access. |
|
Abstract
This study compared different groups yearly based on the different annual quota of Physical Education (PE) classes in anthropometric parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements. The study included adolescents from 14 to 18 years of age, at the Croatian Industrial School in Slavonski Brod. They were 225 participants in the
✉brigita.banjac@gmail.com
1Industrial School, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
2“JJ Strossmayer” University of Osijek, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
3University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
4University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia
st in
Keywords Physical Education • adolescents • academic achievement • anthropometry • fitness test.
Introduction
Physical Education (PE) is the only subject in the school curriculum which concentrates on adolescent’s physical, mental, and social development together. Moreover, it stimulates them for a healthy lifestyle, in which physical activity (PA), besides nutrition, has a primary key.
Participation in PA is essential for adolescent’s growth and development. In addition, it has been demonstrated that PA maintain and improve health (Donnelly et al., 2016), muscular and
cardiorespiratory fitness (World Health Organization, 2018a), and mental wellbeing (Grgantov & Miletić, 2016; Triaca, Frio, & França, 2019; Vedøy, Sigmund, Hege, Knut, & Thurston, 2020). Specifically, having PE classes is associated with higher PA (Silva, Chaput, & Tremblay, 2019), because children who engaged will tend to be more active throughout the day; and have lower sedentary behavior (Silva et al., 2018). PA in scho-
5
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
ol presents a significant component of the adolescents daily PA (Frömel, Svozil, Chmelík, Jakubec, & Groffik, 2016; Groffik, Mitáš, Jakubec, Svozil, & Frömel, 2020). It is also important to remain that PA in childhood is a great predictor for activity level in adulthood (Grgantov & Miletić, 2016).
Despite the numerous health benefits, adolescent’s PA levels have been declining in the past decade, and the majority do not meet the recommended PA guidelines (Guthold, Stevens, Riley, & Bull, 2020). Furthermore, it is alarming how the unhealthy lifestyle habits like sedentary behaviors increased (80% of adolescents are insufficiently physically inactive), which can be related with a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes (World Health Organization, 2018a), obesity (Batzios,
Provatidou, Christoforidis, Sidiropoulos, & Cassimos, 2020) and other risks for health (Guthold et al., 2020). Accordingly, it remains an open question why PE classes are still underestimated in the school curriculum and has a lower importance and value than other subjects. Furthermore, we can ask for the required type, amount, and intensity of PA at PE classes to effect on adolescent’s dimensions of their psychosomatic status.
Evidence indicates a marginalization of PE in schools. The idea that PE only takes adolescents time from increasing school performance may explain the low allocation of PE compared to the other subjects (Marques, Gómez, Martins, Catunda, & Sarmento, 2017). In contrast to that belief, there is a growing literature suggesting that PA has a beneficial effect on learning abilities such as academic achievement (Marques et al., 2017), grade in PE (Vedøy et al., 2020), and cognition (Donnelly et al., 2016).
Generally, two hours of PE in Croatia have been present for more than a century (Findak, 2016). Ever since the responsible Ministry implemented these measures, there have been numerous polemics regarding these restrictions. There is no reason to believe that a reduced number of classes from 2 to 1 are adequate for adolescence, referring to the European Union documents about the mandatory PE classes (Findak, 2016). Increasing the number of PE classes is necessary for children's health and ensuring the basic need for movement (Petrić, 2016) in schools.
Therefore, this study aimed to compare yearly different groups for evaluating the influence of different annual quota of PE classes at adolescents. We hypothesized that there are differences between programs with different annual quota of PE classes, measured in anthropometric parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements and also, that the increased number of PE classes would have a positive, better impact on adolescents in the measured parameters.
Method
This study used a
Anthropometric characteristics were estimated by body height (BH), body weight (BW) and body mass index (BMI). The measurements were conducted with standard and calibrated instruments: weight scale with kg precision for BW, and anthropometer with 1
mmprecision for BH. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated as BW by squared with BH. These measurements were conducted following the IBP standard.
6
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
Table 1. Basics characteristics of the sample
|
|
|
|
Weekly PE classes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Academic |
|
Sample |
Age |
|
Sample |
|
|
Age |
year |
n |
% |
M |
SD |
n |
% |
M |
SD |
120 |
53.3 |
14.92 |
1.65 |
105 |
46.7 |
15.25 |
1.62 |
|
132 |
62.0 |
14.85 |
2.11 |
81 |
38.0 |
15.93 |
1.96 |
|
103 |
51.5 |
15.17 |
1.87 |
97 |
48.5 |
15.54 |
1.74 |
|
172 |
54.0 |
15.24 |
1.96 |
146 |
46.0 |
15.56 |
1.92 |
Table 2. Number of measured courses with different quote of PE classes per week
|
|
|
Weekly PE classes |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Academic year |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Number and type of |
Number of |
Number and type of |
Number of |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
programs (courses) |
adolescents |
|
programs (courses) |
adolescents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
1.C, 1.F, 1.G, |
120 |
5 |
1.B, 1.E, 2.A, |
105 |
||
1.H, 2.C, 2.F, 2.J |
2.D, 2.K |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1.C, 1.F, 1.G, |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
1.H, 1.J, 2.C, 2.F, |
132 |
4 |
1.I, 2.A, 2.K, 3.A |
81 |
||
|
|
2.J |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
1.C, 1.F, 1.H, |
103 |
5 |
1.C, 1.F, 1.H, 2.C, |
97 |
||
2.C, 2.J, 3.C |
2.J, 3.C |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
6 |
1.G, 1.J, 2.C, 2.F, |
172 |
5 |
1.D, 2.A, 2.B, |
146 |
||
2.G, 2.H |
2.E, 2.I |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Legend: A Metal fabricator B; CNC operator; C Auto mechatronics; D Driver; E Technical designer; F Photographer, Car bodyworker; G Plumber, Gas mechanic, Air conditioning and heating mechanic; H Electrician, Car electrician; I Electronic technician,
Physical fitness was tested by the following tests: standing long jump (SLJ),
Grade for PE class and the general achievement grade are taken from the official entries of classes grade books.
Data were collected at the beginning of every school year in September and October (except for the grades). The same PE teacher carried out all the measuring through regular classes of PE.
Descriptive characteristics were calculated for all variables. ANOVA was used to evaluate the differences between groups. The significance level was set at p<0.05. All analyses were conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25.0).
7
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
Results
Descriptive statistics for the anthropometric measures, physical fitness tests, grades of PE class, and general achievement grades at the end of the
school year presented in Table 3 for the period between
Table 3. Differences between groups according to anthropometric measures, physical fitness tests, grades by academic years from
|
1 class per week |
2 class per week |
|
|
Variable |
M±SD |
M±SD |
F |
p |
|
|
|
|
|
2015/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standing long jump (cm) |
195.11±28.66 |
200.97±24.42 |
2.64 |
0.11 |
44.11±7.82 |
46.48±7.21 |
5.29 |
0.02 |
|
Run for 1000 m (s) |
308.72±57.17 |
285.31±45.44 |
10.72 |
0.01 |
Grades in general achievement (out of 5.00) |
3.33±0.83 |
3.26±0.79 |
0.33 |
0.57 |
Grades in PE (out of 5.00) |
4.40±0.72 |
4.22±0.84 |
2.88 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016/17 |
|
|
|
|
Body height (mm) |
1747.61±75.53 |
1759.73±84.00 |
0.90 |
0.34 |
Body weight (kg) |
66.41±15.16 |
68.88±18.21 |
0.89 |
0.35 |
BMI (kg/m2) |
21.63±4.17 |
22.04±4.69 |
0.33 |
0.56 |
Standing long jump (cm) |
205.87±146.25 |
198.41±28.05 |
0.20 |
0.65 |
43.42±8.26 |
44.96±6.48 |
1.99 |
0.16 |
|
Run for 1000 m (s) |
302.75±58.62 |
288.40±44.14 |
3.45 |
0.07 |
Grades in general achievement (out of 5.00) |
3.39±0.66 |
3.38±0.72 |
0.01 |
0.95 |
Grades in PE (out of 5.00) |
4.22±0.83 |
4.30±0.85 |
0.50 |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
2017/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Body height (mm) |
1762.00±66.77 |
1762.59±78.68 |
0.01 |
0.96 |
Body weight (kg) |
68.40±17.16 |
67.79±16.86 |
0.06 |
0.82 |
BMI (kg/m2) |
22.04±4.82 |
21.57±4.40 |
0.42 |
0.52 |
Standing long jump (cm) |
197.53±25.61 |
199.55±29.23 |
0.27 |
0.61 |
45.30±7.83 |
45.39±8.13 |
0.01 |
0.94 |
|
Run for 1000 m (s) |
298.54±45.19 |
286.28±47.39 |
3.09 |
0.08 |
Grades in general achievement (out of 5.00) |
3.59±0.68 |
3.71±0.77 |
1.29 |
0.26 |
Grades in PE (out of 5.00) |
4.23±0.87 |
4.47±0.74 |
4.24 |
0.04 |
2018/19 |
|
|
|
|
Body height (mm) |
1774.26±62.56 |
1781.98±61.34 |
0.52 |
0.47 |
Body weight (kg) |
70.90±14.17 |
67.55±15.01 |
2.94 |
0.09 |
BMI (kg/m2) |
22.50±4.18 |
21.26±4.61 |
4.33 |
0.04 |
Standing long jump (cm) |
195.33±26.73 |
201.90±23.66 |
2.90 |
0.09 |
44.90±7.06 |
46.95±7.45 |
3.24 |
0.07 |
|
Run for 1000 m (s) |
297.33±49.81 |
285.97±36.41 |
2.45 |
0.12 |
Grades in PE (out of 5.00) |
4.07±0.83 |
4.46±0.77 |
9.91 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
The results of ANOVA (p<0.05) also are shown in Table 3. There were significant differences between groups in anthropometric measure: BMI (2018- 2019); physical fitness tests: SU
Also, it is interesting to note from Table 3 that in every academic year group with 2 PE classes per week had better results for physical fitness tests (SLJ, SU, R1000) except for SLJ in
Discussion
Our study compared adolescents for evaluating the influence of different annual quota of PE classes through anthropometric measures, physical fitness tests, and academic achievement. We hypothesized that there are differences between programs with different weekly (1 and 2) and yearly (35 and 70) quota of PE classes. Furthermore, the higher number of PE classes would have a positive, better impact on adolescents in the measured parameters. The results demonstrated that the increased number of PE classes weekly could be related to better results at anthropometric measures (BMI), physical fitness tests (SU, R1000), and academic achievements (GPE). That can be another indicator to regulate the PE system, i.e., to increase the weekly number of PE classes at least for 3, besides the Europen document (Schmidt, 2007).
The necessary time for PE classes’ benefits is underestimated with reduced PE classes (1 and 2 class per week), like in this Croatian vocational school. PE is frequently allocated less time than other subjects in the curriculum and canceled more often (Ken, 2008). Suggestions and propositions (Findak, 2016), as well as the European Union documents referring to the amount of PE in schools of at least 3 per week, should implement to increase the effects of the aims of this educational area. In contrast to the propositions, there is usually a gap between the policy and practice.
Groffik et al. (2020) also support the increasing number of weekly PE. Their research examined two different education systems (Czech Republic with 2, and Poland with 4 PE classes per week), and the Polish system was associated with increased daily vigorous PA among adolescents.
Group with 2 PE classes in the last year of the observation had significantly lower values in BMI. So, there was a negative trend during the research for this anthropometric measure. Not adequate, high BMI potentially leads to a worldwide leading health problem, called obesity (Batzios et al., 2020).
Children and adolescents are less fit nowadays than the earlier generations, caused by less PA (Schmidt, 2007). The unhealthy foods (high in fat and sugar) combined with physical inactivity caused a rise in overweight and obesity (Mura et al., 2015). Discourages, average results from high school students during five years of anthropometric monitoring indicate that negative trend as a forecast for the next generation in assessed anthropological characteristics. There is no doubt that these results are certainly contributed in part by a short duration of PE classes (90 minutes or less) (Petrić, 2016), whereas adolescents do not have that much of opportunity for PA. On the other hand, some PA is even better than none (World Health Organization, 2018a).
Differences in physical fitness tests are only significant at the baseline for SU (2016) and R1000 (2016). The difference in SU values can be attributed to the concept of the teaching program in which there was a more significant emphasis on the development of repetitive power. SLJ does not vary among the two groups, which was expected if we know that the explosive power is mostly innate.
As well known, the school has an essential role in the promotion of PA (World Health Organization, 2018b), and for many children, PE is the only way to engage in organized PA opportunities during the school day (Petrić, 2016;
9
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous PA through the week (World Health Organization, 2018a). Moreover, PA may be influenced by the environmental factors (class size, location, or lesson contexts) (Skala, Springer, Sharma, Hoelscher, & Kelder, 2012) and the state requirements of PE (Lin et al., 2020).
The difference between weekly and annual quota of PE classes can be observed through outcomes of education. Also, there is no reason to believe that physical fitness is not related to academic achievement, whereas physically active adolescents perform better academically (Singh, Uijtdewilligen, Twisk, Mechelen, & Chinapaw, 2012) contrary with inactive individuals. Our results demonstrate the positive impact of increased PE classes on academic achievement because groups with 2 PE classes per week had a significant improvement in GPE (2017, 2018), and positive trend from the baseline. Better PE grades can be related to increased opportunities to acquire the necessary teaching program compared to a group with lower PE weekly quota.
As mentioned earlier, the belief that spending time on PA during school hours inhibits changes to be successful as a student. Various studies demonstrated a contradictory fact that there is a positive correlation between PA and academic achievement (Howie & Pate, 2012; Singh, Uijtdewilligen, Twisk, Van Mechelen, & Chinapaw, 2012), brain function (cognition) and fitness (Donnelly et al., 2016). Similarly, to previous studies, Kim & So (2012) investigated the association between school performance and attendance for < or ≥ than 3 PE classes per week. Their results showed that attending ≥3 PE classes per week improved school performance and academic achievement in Korean adolescent students, and it was highly associated with reading, speaking, writing, and understanding.
If all the previous things are considered, it can conclude that PE classes must be under discussion in the school curriculum. Furthermore, the limitations of this study are also worth considering. First, it is restricted to only a single geographical area. Second, this study has monitored a limited number of adolescents. Third, the differences were determined only in one way of testing. Fourth, the difference between 1 class per week and 2 class per week is not big enough for the transformation influence to be generally significant. Fifth, it has a
10
standardized methods for better highlighting the importance and the positive outcomes of PE classes. Studies should have a longitudinal design.
The results of this study generally indicate differences between groups defined by the number of PE classes per week (1 and 2) in the observed parameters at the Industrial School in Slavonski Brod. PE with a higher weekly number, had a better, positive impact on adolescents measured through anthropometric measures, physical fitness tests, and academic achievement. Therefore, schools (like this vocational school) with a reduced number of PE classes, require changes in its curriculum, i.e., to increase the quota of PE classes to achieve the necessary positive, beneficial physical and mental effects of PE.
References
Batzios, S. P., Provatidou, M., Christoforidis, A., Sidiropoulos, H., & Cassimos, D. C. (2020). Adolescent obesity: Confessions of the young mind.
Metabolism Open, 7, 100044. doi:10.1016/j.metop.2020.100044
Bianco, A., Lupo, C., Alesi, M., Spina, S., Raccuglia, M., Thomas, E., . . . Palma, A. (2015). The sit up test to exhaustion as a test for muscular endurance evaluation. Springerplus, 4(1), 309.
Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Castelli, D., Etnier, J. L., Lee, S., Tomporowski, P., . . .
Fairclough, S., & Stratton, G. (2004). ‘Physical education makes you fit and healthy’. Physical education's contribution to young people's physical activity levels. Health Education Research, 20(1),
Findak, V. (2016). Kineziologija i područja edukacije, sporta, sportske rekreacije i kineziterapije u razvitku hrvatskog društva. In V. Findak (Ed.), Zbornik radova
25.ljetne škole kineziologa Republike Hrvatske (pp.
Frömel, K., Svozil, Z., Chmelík, F., Jakubec, L., & Groffik, D. (2016). The role of physical education lessons and recesses in school lifestyle of adolescents. Journal of School Health, 86(2),
(pp.
(2020). Adolescents’ Physical Activity in Education Systems Varying in the Number of Weekly Physical
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
Education Lessons. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
Howie, E. K., & Pate, R. R. (2012). Physical activity and academic achievement in children: A historical perspective. Journal of sport and health science, 1(3),
Ken, H. (2008). The Situation of Physical Education in Schools: A European Perspective. Human Movement, 9(1),
Kim,
Kuśnierz, C.,
Lin, W., Leider, J., Shang, C., Hennessy, E., Perna, F. M.,
&Chriqui, J. F. (2020). The Association Between State Physical Education Laws and Student Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(3),
Marques, A., Gómez, F., Martins, J., Catunda, R., & Sarmento, H. (2017). Association between physical education,
Mura, G., Rocha, N. B. F., Helmich, I., Budde, H., Machado, S., Wegner, M., . . . Carta, M. G. (2015). Physical activity interventions in schools for improving lifestyle in European countries. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 11(Suppl
1M5),
Petrić, V. (2016). Tjelesna i zdravstvena kultura u funkciji razvoja hrvatskog društva: Analiza tijeka razvoja antropoloških obilježja. U: V. Findak (ur.) Zbornik radova, 25,
participation. Translational Behavioral Medicine. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa013
Sammito, S., Gundlach, N., & Böckelmann, I. (2016). Correlation between the results of three physical fitness tests (endurance, strength, speed) and the output measured during a bicycle ergometer test in a cohort of military servicemen. Military Medical Research, 3(1), 12.
Schmidt, P. (2007). European parliament report on the role of sport in education. Brussels: European Committee on Culture.
Silva, D. A. S., Chaput,
Silva, D. A. S., Chaput,
Singh, A., Uijtdewilligen, L., Twisk, J. W., Mechelen, W. V., & Chinapaw, M. J. M. (2012). Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent
Medicine Clinics, 166(1),
Skala, K. A., Springer, A. E., Sharma, S. V., Hoelscher, D. M., & Kelder, S. H. (2012). Environmental characteristics and student physical activity in PE class: Findings from two large urban areas of Texas. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(4),
Smith, N. J., Monnat, S. M., & Lounsbery, M. A. F. (2015). Physical activity in physical education: are longer lessons better? Journal of School Health, 85(3), 141- 148. doi:10.1111/josh.12233
Triaca, L. M., Frio, G. S., & França, M. T. A. (2019). A gender analysis of the impact of physical education on the mental health of brazilian schoolchildren. SSM -
Population Health, 8, 100419. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100419
Vedøy, I. B., Sigmund, A. A., Hege, E. T., Knut, R. S., & Thurston, M. (2020). Physical activity, mental health and academic achievement: A
World Health Organization. (2018a). Physical Activity. Retrieved from
World Health Organization. (2018b). Promoting physical activity in the education sector. Retrieved from
11
This HTML is created from PDF at
EQOL Journal (2020) 12(2):
How to cite this article:
Džakula, V., Miljković, Z., Pavičić, L., & Banjac, B. (2020). Comparison of adolescents with different annual quota of Physical
APA:Education classes in anthropometric parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements. Exercise and Quality of Life, 12(2),
Džakula, Vedran, et al. „Comparison of adolescents with different annual quota of Physical Education classes in anthropometric
MLA:parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements.“ Exercise and Quality of Life 12.2 (2020):
Džakula, Vedran, Zvonko Miljković, Leo Pavičić, and Brigita Banjac.
"Comparison of adolescents with different annual quota of Physical Education
Chicago:classes in anthropometric parameters, physical fitness tests, and grades achievements." Exercise and Quality of Life 12, no. 2 (2020):
12
This HTML is created from PDF at